The McKinsey Global Institute’s January 2020 report, “Climate risk and response: Physical hazards and socioeconomic impacts,” seeks to answer the question: How could climate change impact socioeconomic systems worldwide in the next three decades?
Researchers Jonathan Woetzel, Dickon Pinner, Hamid Samandari, and others claimed that the earth’s climate has been relatively stable for more than 10,000 years, but it is now changing.
The average rise in temperature is causing fatal heatwaves, frequent flooding, drought, and sea-level rise. The report seeks to understand the extent of climate change’s physical risks over the next three decades.
Based on RCP 8.5, the IPCC’s GHG concentration trajectory pathway, global average temperatures are projected to increase between 1.5 and 5 degrees Celsius in many locations by 2050. RCP 8.5 is the highest emissions scenario, with no adaptation and mitigation assumed. Researchers choose this scenario because it will enable them to assess the physical risks when further decarbonisation is absent.
As of the writing of this blog post, there has been a significant dip in emissions worldwide due to the coronavirus lockdowns.
China’s emissions dropped by 25% in February. Lockdowns in European countries and the United States have also reduced fossil fuel emissions, as shown in satellite images.
However, projections suggest that as soon as the pandemic is over, emissions will increase again, possibly even more than before, as governments and industries revive the economy.
Researchers of the McKinsey report are linking climate models with economic projections to examine nine cases that show exposure to extremes in climate change and the point at which impacts could derail economic and physical activities. The report also provides decision-makers with a new framework and methodology to estimate risks in their own context.
The report contains the following topics and discussions:
Seven characteristics of physical climate risk stand out:
- Increasing. Climate risk will increase by 2030 and further into 2050. Â
- Spatial. Climate hazards manifest locally and vary between and within countries.
- Non-stationary. As the earth continues to warm, climate risk is ever-changing, and further warming will be locked in for the next decade due to the thermal inertia of the earth’s system.
- Nonlinear. Socio-economic impacts from climate change can become non-linear when thresholds are crossed.
- Systemic. It will have knock-on effects across regions and sectors.
- Regressive. The poorest countries and communities are the most vulnerable.
- Under-prepared. Climate adaptation needs to increase significantly to manage climate risks. Tough choices must be made, whether to make infrastructure resilient or move people.
Climate change is already having substantial physical impacts in regions across the world.
The earth’s temperature has risen by about 1.1 C on average since the 1880s. The rise in temperature shifts towards warmer temperatures and broadens. This means that many locations will be hotter than the usual average, and extremely hot days are becoming more likely. In the Northern Hemisphere, the mean summer temperatures have increased over time. Its share in square km that experienced an extremely hot summer has increased from zero to half per cent. During the same period that the globe has warmed, in southern parts of Africa and the Arctic, average temperatures have risen by 0.2 and 0.5 C and 4 to 4.3 C, respectively, while the Oceans have warmed less.
Socioeconomic impacts will likely be nonlinear and have knock-on effects.
These socioeconomic impacts include:
- Livability and workability. For example, heat street could affect humans’ ability to work outdoors, be fatal, and shift disease vectors.
- Food systems. Extreme weather events like drought, floods, and heat could disrupt food production.
- Physical assets like buildings can be damaged or destroyed by extreme weather conditions.
- Disruptions in infrastructure services lead to a decline and rise in service costs, which can affect other sectors.
- Natural capital, such as glaciers, forests, and ocean ecosystems, that provide services to communities and economic activity can be affected.
9 Case Studies of Physical Climate Risk Impacts.
The study has examined climate risk’s direct impacts, adaptation costs, and knock-on effects on various geographies and sectors. These include:
- 1. Increasing heat in India that would affect people’s work,
- 2. Mediterranean basin in a changing climate,
- 3. Reliability of food production in breadbasket regions,
- 4. African farming in a changing precipitation pattern,
- 5. Florida’s mortgages and markets in the face of coastal inundation threats,
- 6. Climate impacts on supply chains,
- 7. Flood risks in coastal cities,
- 8. Infrastructure resilience, and
- 9. Reduced dividends on natural capital.
Global socioeconomic impacts could be substantial. Â Researchers stated that 105 countries are expected to experience at least one major climate on human, physical and natural capital by 2030. The climate hazards include lethal health waves that could affect between 700 million to 1.2 billion. Urban areas in India and Pakistan are projected to experience this first; global agricultural yield volatility will increase; forest fires, flooding, hurricanes and heat can destroy and disrupt infrastructure assets and services. Riverine flooding could double by 2030 and quadruple by 2050; in some parts, a biome shift will affect ecosystems and livelihoods.
Countries with lower GDP per capita levels are generally more exposed. The poorest countries are more exposed as they rely more on outdoor work and natural capital and have less adaptive capacity. Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan are identified as the most vulnerable countries.
What can decision-makers do? Governments must properly assess climate risk, adapt to risks that are locked in or bound to happen, and decarbonize rapidly to reduce further risks. Climate science shows us that further warming can only be halted by achieving net-zero emissions.
The 160+ page report provides exhaustive data on climate risks and physical hazards and their socio-economic impacts in various regions across the globe.
What we presented here is only an overview of the report.
The report provides useful data, analysis, and information for businesses, decision-makers, and governments to help them better assess, adapt to, and mitigate the physical risks of climate change today and over the next three decades.
Reference
Woetzel, J., Pinner, D., Samandari, H., Engel, H., Krishnan, M., Boland, B., Powis, C. (2020, January). Climate risk and response: Physical hazards and socioeconomic impacts. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/climate%20risk%20and%20response%20physical%20hazards%20and%20socioeconomic%20impacts/mgi-climate-risk-and-response-full-report-vf.ashx
PHOTO CREDIT: Lake Eola, Orlando – Florida, USA by Karl Hipolito
Leave a Reply