Can financiers and hedge funds use their investments as leverage to make companies or firms reduce their carbon emissions? An article on The Economist discusses this topic in detail.

The article says that there is a growing “greening trend” in the financial world in the fight to avert climate change. The following are the reasons behind this:

extreme weather events pose threats to investments,
governments are taking steps to limit emissions, and
large asset owners are pressuring companies managing their money to take care of environmental and social issues.

The number of companies in America, Europe, and Japan disclosing their emissions is increasing. These emissions disclosed belongs to a scope-one type emissions, the article says.

The Economist differentiates a company’s emissions as scope-one, scope-two, and scope-three. A classification that Greenhouse Gas uses for emissions reporting as well.

Scope-one refers to emission that companies produced directly;
Scope-two are produced by the companies that provide them with energy;
Scope-three covers all emissions from its suppliers’ extraction of its raw materials through emissions from its end users.

Only a small number of companies- two-thirds of the firms from the S&P 500 and a half from the Euro Stoxx 600 disclose their scope-three emissions. And as expected, scope-three figures are much higher than scope-one emissions.

The article offers possible solutions how firms can reduce emissions, it ranges from either choosing renewable energy sources or helping their suppliers change their behaviour to changing what they are selling- which is the hardest to do according to the article.

Investors especially those that are part of a climate action group of investors such as the Climate Action 100+ can ask their companies to set their emissions reductions targets, disclose carbon-footprint data, or to “clean up their act” (How much can, 2020 June 20).

The article provides examples from research and study on what investors are doing to advance the green trend, such as:

Some investors choose to reward and encourage companies in all sectors to emit less or help others to do so.
A green fund managing hundreds of billions worth of assets excludes fossil-fuel company from their portfolio, while others seek out “climate-solution firms” using technology to reduce energy demands.

There are many ways that financial services can use their investments to steer firms and companies towards the green economy, not as a driver of climate action but as its enabler, The Economist article says.

The article provides a fascinating insight into the finance and financial services’ influential role in influencing firms into climate actions. It offers the latest information where emissions are coming from, emissions by sectors, and sectors most at risk of climate change.

To read the whole article, click on the button below:

HOW MUCH CAN FINANCIERS DO ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE?

Source citation

How much can financiers do about climate change? (2020 June 20). The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/06/20/how-much-can-financiers-do-about-climate-change