The video, “Climate change: the trouble with trees” that The Economist produced explains why planting trees is not the ‘silver bullet’ to combat climate change.
This interesting video discusses why tree planting may not be the ‘panacea’ for climate change, particularly when planting only one species of tree.
It says that monoculture tree plantations like conifer pines can do more harm than good. The best way is natural forestation to maximize carbon sequestration and much more, The Economist (2019) video said.
The motive behind planting thousands upon thousands of these monoculture trees that spreads across entire landscapes and mountains are not so green but more on making money, The Economist (2019) added.
However, experts are looking to a future where carbon payments would create financial incentives, ‘if carbon becomes more important as a commodity then perhaps these natural forests would become more profitable than plantations’, says Simon Lewis, professor of Global Science at UCL and the University of Leeds.
How forests can maximize its carbon sequestration is through natural regeneration and wilding says Isabella Tree, a UK natural forest advocate but added that this kind of activity is hard to get funding because people are driven by targets (The Economist, 2019).
And even if we plant trees in every available land, will it be enough to offset all carbon emissions from fossil fuels?
Watch the video and learn further details on how forestation can maximize carbon sequestration, benefit the land, and ecosystems.