Climate Adaptation Options Needed to Mitigate Global Multi-Hazards Risks on Infrastructure

Home / Articles and News / Climate Adaptation Options Needed to Mitigate Global Multi-Hazards Risks on Infrastructure
Climate Adaptation Options Needed to Mitigate Global Multi-Hazards Risks on Infrastructure

The paper, “A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway” is the first of its kind in terms of quantifying the global risks of multiple natural hazards on road and rail infrastructure.  Natural hazards here include hurricanes, earthquakes, tropical cyclones and surface, river and coastal flooding (“Dr Elco Koks wins,” 2019).

Dr Koks, the lead researcher of the paper, is also a recipient of the prestigious Veni research grant of 250K Euros, which will allow him to work on “improving the resilience of global trade to climate extremes and development of successful adaptation measures” in the next 4 years (“Dr Elco Koks wins,” 2019).

The study that Koks, et al. (2019) conducted talks about how transportation is the backbone in any prosperous economy and its role in providing access to markets, job creation, and social services, among many others. But transportation around the world is increasingly exposed and at risk to multiple natural hazards and thus any services or opportunities – which is a lot, that the transportation infrastructure provides is under threat.

Koks, et al. (2019) used the latest road and railway asset data through OpenStreetMap (OSM) and state-of-the-art global hazard maps as a source of transport infrastructure data and global risk assessment.

The study found out that:

  • 27% of all global road and railway assets are exposed to at least one hazards and 7.5% of all assets are exposed to at least 1 in 100-year flooding.
  • The Global Expected Annual Damages (EAD) due to direct damage to roads and railways range from 3.1 to 22 US billion dollars of which 73% is caused by surface and river flooding.
  • Spending 2% of the road value for better road design will produce a positive return for 60% of the roads that are exposed to at least one flood event, and over 80% of the primary and secondary roads in upper-middle-income countries, and tertiary roads in lower and middle-income countries.
  • Multiple studies show an upward trend in flooding, and flood hazards constitute 89% of the risk in transportation infrastructure, hence, countries should improve transport planning by including risk information and improving the protection of their most vulnerable and critical assets. As the economic and social benefits from doing so will go beyond direct infrastructure damage like impacts on supply chains and production and many others.

Some highlights of the study:

  • The study examined the global exposure of transport infrastructure across 46,566 regions to multiple hazards: its expected annual exposure (EAE) and return period of each hazard for the region examined.
  • The Global Expected Annual Damages (EAD) represents between 0.2 and 1.5% of annual global maintenance needs. A big chunk of the EAD is from surface and river flooding, followed by coastal floods, earthquakes, and cyclones.
  • When EAD is assessed by the income of each country, high-income countries only account for a quarter of the risks, while upper-middle-income countries bare half, and the lower middle income almost a third of the global risks. This finding means that richer countries have lower risks to multiple hazards compared to lower-income countries because ‘they invest more in higher protection standards of flood defence’.
  • The study showed 20 countries in which their transport infrastructure has the highest risk of natural hazards.
  • And discussed how to reduce these risks by improving road designs.

The study provides data and information that will be useful for engineers, architects, and city planners involved in transport infrastructure management.

It also provides a model to integrate climate change and natural hazards risks and exposures into infrastructure planning and management, investments, and resource allocation, while using the latest global hazard mapping tools to assess risks to provide more accurate information, and well-informed recommendations.

Surely, climate adaptation solutions must be considered in mitigating the multiple natural risks that have been identified in Koks, et al.’s study.

Read the full article by clicking on the button below:

To cite the resources mentioned in this blog post, please use the following:

Dr Elco Koks wins prestigious Veni grant, funded by the Dutch Research Council (NOW) (n.d.), ITRC mistral. Retrieved from https://www.itrc.org.uk/highlights/dr-elco-koks-wins-prestigious-veni-grant-funded-by-the-dutch-research-council-nwo/

Koks, E.E., Rozenberg, J., Zorn, C., Taruverdu M., Vousdoukas, M., Fraser, S.A., Hall, J.W., and Hallegatte, S. (2019). A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nat Commun 10, 2677  doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10442-3. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10442-3

PHOTO CREDIT: The background photo used in the featured image was grabbed from the NZ Transport Agency‘s video, “Kaikōura earthquake recovery – our story

Leave a Reply

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: